ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Prioritizing rehabilitation in Pakistan's health system: a qualitative policy analysis.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRehabilitation, is a neglected domain in Pakistan’s health system. There are insufficient financial and human resources to address the unmet needs. Despite the increasing demand for rehabilitation and assistive technology (AT) and implications for improving health inequities, it receives little political attention. This analysis identifies the factors that shape the prioritization of rehabilitation in Pakistan’s national health system.
methodsWe conducted 29 key informant interviews with actors concerned with rehabilitation policy and practice in Pakistan, complemented by a purposeful review of peer-reviewed and grey literature to achieve thematic saturation. The data was triangulated and thematically analyzed using a policy framework on national prioritization of rehabilitation services.
resultsBased on the framework, we identified three key elements that shape the inadequate prioritization of rehabilitation in Pakistan. First, rehabilitation lacks a consistent problem definition; there is a lack of consensus among key actors regarding the importance and need for rehabilitation and AT in the health system. Second, governance arrangements are fragmented across multiple ministries, with rehabilitation services often being associated with disability and included under the Social Welfare Department, rather than the Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations, and Coordination (MoNHSRC). Third, with respect to structural factors, scarcity of resources in the existing health system, societal stigmas and social inequalities have negatively shaped the abilities of both rehabilitation service seekers and providers.
conclusionIdentifying the key components impeding prioritization for rehabilitation in Pakistan’s health system is a crucial first step in advancing the issue within sub-national and national policy agendas and improving equity in access to rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation professionals and other actors responsible for rehabilitation policy and practice should systematically work together to prioritize and integrate rehabilitation services within the current health system structures to advance health equity, enabling all individuals to lead fulfilling lives, regardless of their background or circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.