ArticleBMC public health2026
The effect of coping with stress in predicting the needs, death anxiety, and depression of patients' relatives in intensive care units.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to examine the effects of coping with stress in predicting the needs, death anxiety, and depression of relatives of patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units. MATERIALS AND
methodsA sample of 366 relatives of patients hospitalized in intensive care units was formed, and data were collected face-to-face using a General Information Form, the Needs Scale for Patient Relatives in Intensive Care Units, Turkish Death Anxiety Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory and the Ways of Coping with Stress Scale. The sample consisted of relatives of patients hospitalized in intensive care between September 2021 and June 2022. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 22.0 program.The data were analyzed using numbers, percentages, means, standard deviations, Pearson Correlation, and regression analysis.
resultsThe mean total needs score of the patient relatives was found to be 123.462 ± 24.918, the mean death anxiety score was 42.653 ± 19.881, and the mean depression score was 10.500 ± 8.270. In the dimension of coping styles, the means were as follows: self-confident approach 18.954 ± 4.389, desperate approach 20.820 ± 4.306, submissive approach 15.863 ± 3.162, optimistic approach 15.093 ± 2.788, and seeking social support 9.396 ± 2.251. A positive and statistically significant correlation was found between death anxiety and the total needs score (r = 0.393, p < 0.01). This finding indicates that as death anxiety increases, the needs level of the patient’s relatives also increases. Conversely, a negative and statistically significant correlation was found between a confident coping approach and the total needs score (r = − 0.326, p < 0.01). This result shows that as confident coping skills increase, the perceived needs level decreases. Similarly, a negative, strong, and statistically significant correlation was found between an optimistic approach and the total needs score (r = − 0.359, p < 0.01). This finding reveals that individuals who use optimistic coping strategies more frequently have lower needs levels.
conclusionPatients’ families have several needs. Increasing the level of needs of patients’ families leads to increased death anxiety, while decreasing self-confidence and optimistic coping strategies. This demonstrates that a holistic approach, focusing not only on the patients but also on the needs of their families, is crucial for preventing potential psychological symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.