SynthesisBMC health services research2026
Utilization of traditional Chinese medicine services and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs global demand for healthcare rises and recognition of traditional medicine grows, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is receiving increasing international attention. Analyzing the utilization of TCM services and the factors influencing their use is essential for optimizing the service system, improving service quality, and supporting the preservation and development of TCM.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases. Studies published between January 1, 2015, and January 15, 2025, addressing the utilization of TCM services and their influencing factors were included. NoteExpress software was used for literature management. Literature quality was assessed using the Joana Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for cross-sectional studies. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel software. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software, and pooled utilization was estimated using random effects models.
resultsA total of 33 studies comprising 41,103 participants were included. The exploratory pooled utilization rate of TCM services was 41% (95% CI: 32%-52%, I
conclusionThe utilization of TCM services remains limited. Targeted dissemination is recommended to enhance public knowledge and awareness of TCM. Policymakers should prioritize optimizing resource allocation and improving service accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.