Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606545›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Internal structure and factorial invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9) in a large Argentinean sample.

Pablo Ezequiel Flores-Kanter, Luciana Moretti, Roger Muñoz-Navarro, Paloma Ruíz-Rodríguez, Antonio Cano-Vindel, Leonardo Adrián Medrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo Ezequiel Flores-KanterUniversidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina. pablo.floreskanter@ues21.edu.ar.
Luciana MorettiUniversidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina.
Roger Muñoz-NavarroDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Paloma Ruíz-RodríguezTres Cantos, Primary Care Center, Health Service of Madrid, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Cano-VindelFaculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Leonardo Adrián MedranoFaculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is one of the most prevalent psychological disorders and the leading cause of disability worldwide. The development of effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of depression requires valid and reliable instruments capable of accurately assessing this condition. The present study examined the internal structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) in an Argentine population.

methodsSeveral measurement models proposed in the international literature were tested in a large Argentine sample (N = 5,950), comprising three independent subsamples: an online sample (n = 4,803), a clinical sample of individuals seeking psychological assistance (n = 98), and a random telephone sample (n = 1,049). PHQ-9 item responses were analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). In addition, measurement invariance was evaluated across gender, age groups, and administration formats.

resultsThe unidimensional model demonstrated good fit across most indices. Although two-factor models showed marginal improvements in fit, correlations between latent factors were consistently high (> 0.80). ESEM analyses indicated that these high correlations were not attributable to estimation bias arising from restrictive CFA specifications, further supporting a unidimensional structure. Moreover, the unidimensional model exhibited measurement invariance across gender, age groups, and administration formats.

conclusionsThe findings support the use of the PHQ-9 to derive a global measure (e.g., sum score) of depressive symptom severity in the Argentine population, without systematic bias associated with demographic characteristics or mode of data collection. Further studies are warranted to replicate these results and extend validity evidence.

Indexed as

DepressionDepressive DisorderPatient Health QuestionnairePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentAdultAgedArgentinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCFAConstruct validityDepressionESEMInternal structureMental health

Identifiers

PMID41606545
PMCPMC12924556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.