ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
When a chatbot asks "How are you?": A cross-sectional study of AI call conversations and depressive symptom detection among older adults in rural South Korea.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Based Measurement Tools for Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid population aging in Korea has intensified the need for emotional and health-related support among older adults, especially in rural regions facing depopulation and limited care resources. Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) call systems have emerged as potential tools for monitoring daily well-being and detecting early signs of psychological distress. This study examined the association between conversational patterns in a conversational AI call service and risk of depressive symptoms among community-dwelling older adults, integrating quantitative and qualitative analyses to evaluate the system’s feasibility and limitations.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 2,896 adults aged 65 years or older residing in Jeongeup City, who used the Naver Clova AI CareCall service and completed a survey between May and August 2024. We linked 37,294 call records with survey data to compare service utilization patterns between high-risk (Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form score ≥ 2) and low-risk groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the risk of depressive symptoms. We reviewed 73 conversation cases containing depressive cues, categorized into ten subthemes based on World Health Organization’s criteria. Three researchers independently assessed AI detection accuracy as correct, misinterpreted, or missed.
resultsAmong all participants, 42.0% were classified as high-risk for depressive symptoms. They were older, more likely to live alone, received social assistance more frequently, and reported poorer health. The high-risk group had fewer positive responses, more negative and unasked responses, and longer call durations. After adjustment, average negative responses (aOR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04–1.35), unasked domains (aOR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03–1.21), and longer call time (aOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02) were associated with a higher risk of depressive symptoms. Qualitative findings revealed expressions such as appetite loss, fatigue, and hopelessness, though the AI frequently misinterpreted or failed to detect them due to contextual or speech-recognition errors.
conclusionsThis study provides real-world evidence that conversational and linguistic features in AI call service are associated with the risk of depressive symptoms among older adults in rural communities. AI call service may complement mental health monitoring by enabling early detection of emotional distress. However, limited contextual understanding and variable user acceptance highlight the need for continued technical refinement and integration with professional interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.