ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Animal-assisted support programs for residents in Canadian long-term care homes: a feasibility and acceptability study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnimal-assisted services, specifically animal-assisted support programs (AASPs, pet therapy, animal-assisted therapy, animal-assisted activities), are promising programs that may improve the mental health and overall well-being of older adults living with and without dementia in long-term care (LTC) homes. Few studies have explored the perspectives of residents and LTC staff regarding AASPs for older adults. This study aimed to identify the initial perspectives of LTC staff regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and other factors influencing the implementation of a live AASP within Canadian LTC homes. Our secondary aim was to supplement the perspectives of the LTC staff with interviews from LTC residents and community members.
methodsQualitative semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted in 2022 and 2023 with LTC staff members from one LTC home in Alberta, Canada. Additional interviews with community members and LTC residents supplemented these interviews. The interviews were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's recommendations for thematic analysis.
resultsEighteen individuals were interviewed, including 14 LTC staff, 2 LTC residents, and 2 community members (one AASP volunteer and one individual living with dementia). Four key themes were identified: (1) Experiences with animals in LTC, (2) Acceptability and perceived benefits of AASPs, (3) Perceived challenges of AASPs and associated mitigators, and (4) Preferences and recommendations for AASPs in LTC.
conclusionsAASPs have many potential benefits for residents and staff in LTC homes, including perceived improvements in mood and social engagement. Interview participants provided insights and recommendations for future AASPs, including understanding the challenges to implementing AASPs, such as the fear of animals. The interview findings will inform the design of an AASP intervention and a pilot study to implement and evaluate the intervention in LTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.