Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606487›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026

Successful management of protracted anaphylaxis-induced severe acute respiratory distress syndrome masquerading as non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a rare case report.

Hanh-Duyen Bui-Thi, Vu Hoang Vu, Khang Duong Nguyen, Thanh-Son Do-Truong, Nguyen Ngoc Khoi Truong, Hoa Tran, Dung The Bui, Binh Quang Truong

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanh-Duyen Bui-ThiDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vu Hoang VuCardiovascular Center, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. vu.vh@umc.edu.vn.
Khang Duong NguyenCardiovascular Center, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thanh-Son Do-TruongDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Ngoc Khoi TruongCardiovascular Center, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoa TranCardiovascular Center, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Dung The BuiCardiovascular Center, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Binh Quang TruongCardiovascular Center, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang Street, Cho Lon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged anaphylaxis, especially symptoms that last several days, can lead to misdiagnosis and delays in treatment, especially when patients present with complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and secondary myocardial injury. A thorough review of medical history is very important for accurate diagnosis. Early recognition and intervention are essential for managing both the allergic response and pulmonary-cardiac injury. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 70-year-old woman with no significant medical history who developed rapid respiratory failure and extremely elevated troponin levels. The patient was initially diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) complicated by pulmonary edema, and the patient's condition continued to worsen despite coronary intervention. A reevaluation revealed that anaphylaxis was potentially triggered by the recent use of floctafenine and meloxicam, which were taken as painkillers four days before admission. The administration of epinephrine led to a marked improvement in her condition, and she was successfully discharged without further complications.

conclusionProtracted anaphylaxis, especially when complicated by ARDS and myocardial injury mimicking NSTEMI, requires careful diagnostic consideration. Clinicians must thoroughly evaluate patient history, particularly recent medication use, to avoid misdiagnosis. Epinephrine remains a crucial treatment in such cases, and prompt administration can be life-saving. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of protracted anaphylaxis and the importance of comprehensive clinical assessment and timely intervention.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisEpinephrineNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMeloxicamortho-AminobenzoatesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTroponinAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticEpinephrinefloctafenineMeloxicamortho-AminobenzoatesTroponinAcute myocardial infarctionAcute respiratory distress syndromeAnaphylaxisCase reportNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

Identifiers

PMID41606487
PMCPMC12924358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.