Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606397›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2026

Evaluating the effect of cryotherapy and low-level laser therapy on postoperative pain and quality of life in patients with symptomatic apical periodontitis- a randomized controlled clinical study.

Krishnamoorthy KungumaSupraja, Diana Davidson, Dasarathan Duraivel, Saravanan Poorni, Manali Ramakrishnan Srinivasan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krishnamoorthy KungumaSuprajaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Diana DavidsonDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Dasarathan DuraivelDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Saravanan PoorniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India. poorniis@yahoo.com.
Manali Ramakrishnan SrinivasanDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to compare the effect of intracanal cryotherapy and intraoral Low-Level LASER Therapy (LLLT) applications on postoperative pain and quality of life in patients following endodontic treatment for symptomatic apical periodontitis. After ethical clearance and registering the trial at clinical trial registry of India, a randomized, parallel-controlled clinical study with 2 test arms and 1 control arm was conducted. 90 subjects diagnosed with acute apical periodontitis in molar teeth meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled in the current trial. After obtaining written informed consent, first researcher randomly allocated the subjects into 3 arms: intracanal cryotherapy, intraoral Low-Level LASER Therapy (LLLT) and control. Preoperative pain scores were marked on the Heft- Parker visual analog scale (HP-VAS) by the second researcher. Preoperative quality of life was marked by the subjects on the Oral Health Impact Profile-17 (OHIP-17) questionnaire. Root canal treatment was performed for all the subjects enrolled in the study and the interventions were performed accordingly, by a single operator. The patients were instructed to record their postoperative pain levels and analgesics intake at 24 h, 48 h, the third day, fifth day, and seventh day. On the seventh day postoperative quality of life questionnaire was recorded by the subjects. The data were tabulated in MS Excel and statistically analyzed using the EPI-INFO software. After 24 h, postoperative pain reduced significantly in the cryotherapy arm when compared with the LLLT arm. However, no statistically significant differences in postoperative pain were found between the two test arms at 48 h, the third day, fifth day, and seventh day. Subjects in the control arm were relieved of postoperative pain after the fifth day. Subjects in the cryotherapy arm required fewer analgesics, with intake limited to the first 24 h postoperatively. Conversely, participants in the LLLT arm needed analgesics for the initial 48 h postoperatively. In contrast, subjects in the control arm had the longest duration of analgesic use, up to the fifth day. The quality of life for all the subjects was found to improve postoperatively after seven days, irrespective of additional interventions. Application of cryotherapy and Low-Level LASER Therapy was found to be effective at 24 h and 48 h respectively, in the management of postoperative endodontic pain. The findings highlight the potential benefits of cryotherapy and LLLT compared to standard postoperative care alone. Henceforth, cryotherapy and Low-Level LASER Therapy could be utilized, as they are simple and innocuous modalities to manage post-endodontic pain.

Indexed as

CryotherapyLow-Level Light TherapyPeriapical PeriodontitisPostoperative PainQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRoot Canal TherapyYoung AdultCryotherapyLow level LASER TherapyPost Endodontic PainPost operative PainQuality of LifeSymptomatic Apical Periodontitis

Identifiers

PMID41606397
PMCPMC12852289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.