ArticleOdontology2026
Top-cited articles on vital pulp therapy for irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced bibliometric analysis of computer-controlled local anesthesia research in pediatric dentistry incorporating productivity laws and network analysis.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vital pulp therapies (VPTs) have emerged as a potential alternative to nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT) for irreversible pulpitis (IP) in permanent teeth. Although many studies explored VPT efficacy, no bibliometric analysis has focused on this topic. A systematic Web of Science search (May 29, 2025) identified 319 eligible articles using keywords related to VPTs and IP. Only full-length articles published in English and indexed within the Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine categories were included, while dissertations, conference papers, editorials, letters, retracted publications, and articles with unspecified document types were excluded. The 50 most-cited papers were analyzed for citations, authorship, institutions, countries, keywords, and study design. Data were processed with SPSS and VOSviewer. The top 50 most-cited articles accumulated 3,869 citations. The most-cited article (356 citations) was the European Society of Endodontology's position statement (2019). A significant increase in publications occurred after 2015, with peak outputs in 2019 and 2022. Most studies were clinical trials, mainly randomized, followed by non-randomized and observational studies. Iran, the USA, Jordan, India, and Ireland were leading contributor countries, with Shahid Beheshti University, Jordan University of Science and Technology, and Dublin Dental University Hospital standing out as key institutions. Author analysis revealed that Asgary S, Taha NA, and Duncan HF were among the most influential researchers. Keyword mapping showed "pulpotomy" as the dominant focus, followed by "pulpitis" and "irreversible pulpitis." There is growing scientific interest in VPTs for IP, though more high-level evidence is needed. This analysis identifies current research patterns and gaps to guide future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.