ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning for construction waste detection using ConvNeXt V2 EMA attention and WIoU v3 loss.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid increase in construction waste, traditional manual sorting methods have become inefficient, and enhancing automatic recognition and classification capabilities has become critical to mitigating resource wastage and environmental pollution. To improve the accuracy of construction waste detection and reduce the false detection rate, this study proposes an optimized detection model, termed YOLO-CEW, designed to enhance both the precision and robustness of construction waste detection. The model integrates the ConvNeXt V2 module, EMA multi-scale attention mechanism, and WIoU v3 loss function, and is developed by optimizing YOLOv8 as the baseline model. These improvements strengthen feature extraction capability, increase localization accuracy, and effectively reduce the interference of low-quality samples. Using the Construction and Demolition Debris Object Detection (CODD) dataset for training and testing, experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a precision of 96.84%, recall of 95.95%, mAP@50 of 98.13%, and an F1-score of 96.39%, all surpassing the original baseline model. Ablation studies further confirm the substantial contribution of each improved module to overall performance. In addition, statistical testing using the bootstrap method validates that the performance gains of the model are statistically significant. Comparative experiments with multiple YOLO variants show that YOLO-CEW exhibits superior accuracy and recall in construction waste detection tasks and thus holds strong potential for practical applications. This study provides a more efficient technical solution to support smart city development and the management of construction waste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.