ArticleMemory & cognition2026
The role of awareness in self-derivation of new knowledge through memory integration.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge is built through direct experiences and productive processes like self-derivation through memory integration. Prior research suggests that individual variability in self-derivation is associated with awareness of the task structure. In three experiments, half of the participants were told the task structure before participating in a self-derivation task (between-subjects manipulations). In a fourth experiment, half of participants were told the task structure before the second half of the task trials (within-subjects manipulation). Explicit instruction regarding the task structure did not facilitate self-derivation performance in any of the experiments. Additionally, neither providing the opportunity to explicitly practice the task through example trials (Experiment 2) nor implicitly practice the task by engaging in the task three (Experiment 3) or two (Experiment 4) times facilitated self-derivation performance. The interventions failed to facilitate self-derivation performance even when participants clearly encoded and remembered information about the task structure (Experiments 1B and 4). As in prior research, at the individual level, measures of verbal comprehension and working memory were positively correlated with task performance. We also measured task-based (debriefing questions) and trait-based (Metacognitive Awareness Inventory) awareness and found that only task-based awareness was positively associated with self-derivation performance. These results provide novel insights into the role (or lack thereof) of information about the task structure and suggest that self-discovery of the opportunity to self-derive new information may be the key.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41606236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.