ReviewNeotropical entomology2026
Plant Extracts and Essential Oils Against Major Pests of Citrus and Red Fruits: Trends, Limitations and Knowledge Gaps.
Review in Neotropical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Citrus and red fruit crops are exposed to constant pest pressure, leading growers to rely heavily on synthetic insecticides. This dependence raises problems related to resistance, impacts on non-target organisms, and chemical residues. This review synthesizes data from 411 peer-reviewed articles to evaluate the effectiveness of plant-based extracts as pest control tools in the context of these crops. Research activity on plant-based products and their applications in this sector grew sharply after 2011, with most studies conducted in Brazil, China, Egypt, Iran, and the USA. The focus was predominantly on mite species, like Tetranychus urticae, while other pests are underrepresented. Essential oils are the most tested products, particularly those containing α-pinene, carvacrol, thymol, and 1,8-cineole. Laboratory studies dominate while field-based testing is still rare. Most trials target adult pests, and immature stages, including eggs and/or larvae, are often ignored. Plant extracts trigger multiple negative effects in targeted pests, encompassing high mortality, reduced fertility, longer development times, enzyme disruption, and altered behavior. Yet, some extracts also produce unexpected results, such as increased reproduction, attraction to treated areas, or no effect. Only 11% of the studies included non-target species, and 6% reported harmful side effects with some compounds reported to cause mortality in natural enemies or pollinators. While current research is uneven and often disconnected from practical farming needs, future research priorities should include testing under real conditions, evaluating more pest species and extract types, and addressing non-target safety. Plant extracts hold strong potential, but their real value depends on how they can be applied and validated in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41606224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.