Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606224›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2026

Plant Extracts and Essential Oils Against Major Pests of Citrus and Red Fruits: Trends, Limitations and Knowledge Gaps.

Hasnae Ennouinou, Fouad Mokrini, Salah-Eddine Laasli, Lhoussaine El Rhaffari, Khalid Haddi, Abdelmalek Boutaleb Joutei, Rachid Lahlali, Khalid Khfif

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hasnae EnnouinouLab of Entomology, Research Unit on Nuclear Techniques, Environment, and Quality, National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Tangier, Morocco.
Fouad MokriniBiotechnology Unit, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Rabat, Morocco.
Salah-Eddine LaasliPhytopathology Unit, Dept of Plant Protection, National School of Agriculture of Meknes, Meknes, Morocco.
Lhoussaine El RhaffariLab of Bio-Actives Health and Environment, Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismail Univ of Meknes, Meknes, Morocco.
Khalid HaddiDepto de Entomologia, Univ Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Abdelmalek Boutaleb JouteiZoology Unit, Dept of Plant Protection, National School of Agriculture of Meknes, Meknes, Morocco.
Rachid Lahlali *Phytopathology Unit, Dept of Plant Protection, National School of Agriculture of Meknes, Meknes, Morocco.
Khalid Khfif *Lab of Entomology, Research Unit on Nuclear Techniques, Environment, and Quality, National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Tangier, Morocco. khalid.khfif@inra.ma.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-8845

Funding

MAPMDREF MCRDV/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citrus and red fruit crops are exposed to constant pest pressure, leading growers to rely heavily on synthetic insecticides. This dependence raises problems related to resistance, impacts on non-target organisms, and chemical residues. This review synthesizes data from 411 peer-reviewed articles to evaluate the effectiveness of plant-based extracts as pest control tools in the context of these crops. Research activity on plant-based products and their applications in this sector grew sharply after 2011, with most studies conducted in Brazil, China, Egypt, Iran, and the USA. The focus was predominantly on mite species, like Tetranychus urticae, while other pests are underrepresented. Essential oils are the most tested products, particularly those containing α-pinene, carvacrol, thymol, and 1,8-cineole. Laboratory studies dominate while field-based testing is still rare. Most trials target adult pests, and immature stages, including eggs and/or larvae, are often ignored. Plant extracts trigger multiple negative effects in targeted pests, encompassing high mortality, reduced fertility, longer development times, enzyme disruption, and altered behavior. Yet, some extracts also produce unexpected results, such as increased reproduction, attraction to treated areas, or no effect. Only 11% of the studies included non-target species, and 6% reported harmful side effects with some compounds reported to cause mortality in natural enemies or pollinators. While current research is uneven and often disconnected from practical farming needs, future research priorities should include testing under real conditions, evaluating more pest species and extract types, and addressing non-target safety. Plant extracts hold strong potential, but their real value depends on how they can be applied and validated in the field.

Indexed as

CitrusOils, VolatilePlant ExtractsAnimalsEvidence GapsFruitOils, VolatilePlant ExtractsBotanical compoundsCrop pest managementEssential oilsExperimental trendsLethal effectsSublethal effects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.