ArticleScientific reports2026
Testing the causal relationship between interpersonal closeness and inter-brain synchrony.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inducing Interpersonal Closeness: Effects on Inter-Brain Synchrony and Collaborative Performance.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has suggested a relationship between interpersonal closeness and inter-brain synchrony (IBS), but evidence is correlational, and the behavioural mechanisms involved remain unclear. In this study, we experimentally manipulated closeness in 123 pairs of strangers to test its causal effects on IBS and motor synchrony. Using mobile EEG hyperscanning and video recordings, we measured IBS and motor synchrony as pairs engaged in three between-subject conditions: no-interaction control, small-talk, or closeness-generating conversation. The manipulation successfully increased perceived closeness: the closeness-generating conversation led to significantly greater closeness than small talk. However, IBS and motor synchrony did not differ between the two conditions, nor were they associated with self-reported closeness. In contrast, social interaction strongly influenced synchrony: interacting pairs showed greater delta (1–4 Hz) IBS and higher motor synchrony compared with non-interacting pairs. Importantly, although both delta IBS and motor synchrony were higher during social interaction, motor synchrony did not account for the IBS increase, suggesting that other aspects of social interaction drove the observed neural coupling. Although we found no causal effect of closeness on IBS, these findings suggest that delta-band IBS could be a marker of social interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.