ArticleScientific reports2026
Automatic identification and feature analysis of Min-ing-Induced surface cracks using an improved DRA-UNet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mining-induced surface cracks are critical indicators of overburden deformation and pose significant threats to ground stability and mine safety. However, their fine-scale geometry and complex background interference make automated extraction challenging. This study proposes an improved DRA-UNet model for high-precision crack detection from UAV orthophotos. The network integrates residual learning, a dual-attention mechanism (DAM), and an atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) module to enhance feature representation, suppress noise, and capture multi-scale contextual information. A complete analytical framework is established by coupling crack segmentation with skeleton extraction and quantitative geometric characterization, enabling fine-scale morphological analysis. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms representative segmentation models, achieving an F1-score of 71.60% and MIoU of 70.00% on a mining-area UAV dataset. Ablation studies verify the effectiveness of each module, while external validation on the Crack500 dataset demonstrates strong cross-scene generalization (F1 = 85.32%, MIoU = 83.69%). Geometric analysis reveals pronounced right-skewed distributions of crack length, width, and area, with rectangularity decreasing as crack length increases. Spatial results indicate higher crack density and complexity near working-face boundaries. Overall, the proposed framework provides a robust and fully automated solution for mining-induced crack detection and morphological analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.