ArticleScientific reports2026
Straightforward model-based approach using only field data and open-source maps to improve carbon stock estimates for REDD + projects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate estimation of forest biomass at property-level finds diverse applications, being particularly important for REDD + projects (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation). This study presents a straightforward method for improving carbon stock estimates by integrating geolocated field plot data with open-source large-scale maps. We evaluated the performance of simple predictive models using spatial coordinates and global maps as covariates. Our results demonstrate that even without advanced remote sensing data and complex modeling techniques, incorporating spatial information and open-source data can substantially improve carbon stock estimates. Spatial coordinates and global map information significantly enhanced predictions with a 31.9% decrease in MAE for areas near field plots (i.e., predictions inside the REDD + project), and 18.6% decrease in greater distances (i.e., predictions for the broader region outside the REDD + project). Moreover, our approach allows for the generation of high-resolution wall-to-wall carbon stock maps for entire REDD + project areas, even in the absence of high-quality local remote sensing data. We conclude that large-scale maps, when properly calibrated with local field data, are invaluable for improving carbon stock predictions in tropical forests. Our method is widely applicable, providing a practical solution for users interested in enhancing their carbon stock estimates at a local scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.