Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606186›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Mu rhythm motor-auditory delay in imagined speech mirrors overt speech timing.

Francesco Mantegna, David Poeppel, Joan Orpella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Temporally structured motor and auditory representations in covert syllable production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco MantegnaDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. fm1672@nyu.edu.
David PoeppelDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Joan OrpellaDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speaking-whether overtly or covertly-requires a mapping between motor commands and their sensory consequences, a process of sensorimotor coordination. The timing of sensorimotor coordination during overt speech is relatively well established. Here we asked whether during imagined speech sensorimotor coordination can preserve this timing and remain grounded in the same biophysical constraints underlying vocal articulation. We instructed participants to imagine producing visually presented syllables (/pa/, /ta/, /ka/). Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated the spatiotemporal dynamics of mu rhythm (8-30 Hz) power suppression. Cluster-based permutation analysis reveals a segregation of alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) frequencies to auditory and motor areas, respectively. Latency analyses show that beta suppression in motor areas precedes alpha suppression in auditory areas by ~ 120 ms. This delay closely matches sensorimotor coordination time windows previously reported for overt speech. While prior work provided only indirect evidence for the temporal equivalence between imagined and overt speech-by probing the system with altered auditory feedback-our findings offer direct evidence by measuring strictly internal neural processes. Together, the results demonstrate the suitability of alpha-beta power suppression as a neural marker that separately indexes motor and auditory processes associated with imagined speech production.

Indexed as

ImaginationSpeechAdultFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleYoung AdultCovert speechEfferenceEvent-Related DesynchronizationMagnetoencephalographySensorimotor coordination

Identifiers

PMID41606186
PMCPMC12909796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.