ArticleScientific reports2026
Mu rhythm motor-auditory delay in imagined speech mirrors overt speech timing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neural architecture for imagined and overt speech motor dynamics.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Temporally structured motor and auditory representations in covert syllable production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- MEG state dynamics of sentence generation: evidence for a compensatory segmentation mechanism in healthy aging.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speaking-whether overtly or covertly-requires a mapping between motor commands and their sensory consequences, a process of sensorimotor coordination. The timing of sensorimotor coordination during overt speech is relatively well established. Here we asked whether during imagined speech sensorimotor coordination can preserve this timing and remain grounded in the same biophysical constraints underlying vocal articulation. We instructed participants to imagine producing visually presented syllables (/pa/, /ta/, /ka/). Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated the spatiotemporal dynamics of mu rhythm (8-30 Hz) power suppression. Cluster-based permutation analysis reveals a segregation of alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) frequencies to auditory and motor areas, respectively. Latency analyses show that beta suppression in motor areas precedes alpha suppression in auditory areas by ~ 120 ms. This delay closely matches sensorimotor coordination time windows previously reported for overt speech. While prior work provided only indirect evidence for the temporal equivalence between imagined and overt speech-by probing the system with altered auditory feedback-our findings offer direct evidence by measuring strictly internal neural processes. Together, the results demonstrate the suitability of alpha-beta power suppression as a neural marker that separately indexes motor and auditory processes associated with imagined speech production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.