Observational studySurgical endoscopy2026
Automatic metrics from a new colon phantom can ensure basic competency in colonoscopy.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. As global screening programs expand, there is an increasing need for validated tools that ensure colonoscopy competence before trainees perform procedures on patients. This study examined validity evidence for a simulation-based colonoscopy test using a novel colon phantom with automated performance metrics.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 42 participants from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden were categorized as novice (0 procedures), intermediate (1-999), or experienced (>1000). Each completed three colonoscopy cases (EASY, STANDARD, ADVANCED 1) using the Mikoto simulator, which combines realistic haptics with automatic recording of key metrics: time to reach the caecum and the Sigmoid-Colon Elongation Index, a refined measure of unnecessary force and excessive stretching during scope advancement-reflecting the gentleness and finesse of scope manipulation. After successful intubation, participants performed a mucosal inspection scored by the PolypTumor Detection Score. Validity evidence was evaluated following Messick's framework, and pass/fail standards were set using the contrasting groups' method.
resultsInter-case reliability was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.93 for time; 0.83 for elongation index). Simulator metrics clearly discriminated between experience levels (p < 0.001), and strong inverse correlations were observed between time and elongation index (r = - 0.78 to - 0.89), indicating that the fastest participants were also the gentlest. None of the novices passed, while 36% of intermediates and 67% of experts met all non-compensatory pass criteria.
conclusionThe Mikoto colon phantom offers objective, reliable, and automated assessment of colonoscopy competence, integrating both efficiency and tissue-friendly technique. Strong validity evidence supports its use for proficiency-based training and skills maintenance, as failure among many experienced endoscopists highlights its potential for periodic re-evaluation and continued professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41606141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.