ArticleScientific reports2026
Decoding environmental regimes and spring phytoplankton bloom occurrence in the central Yellow Sea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phytoplankton blooms, defined as a periods of high biomass, are key indicators of climate-driven ocean responses. Shifts in their timing and magnitude can substantially alter the marine ecosystem, yet the environmental regimes governing bloom development remain poorly constrained. We analyzed long-term environmental data (2003-2023) from the Central Yellow Sea (CYS) to decode the drivers of the spring phytoplankton bloom (SPB), which is defined into four developmental stages based on changes in chlorophyll-a (Chl-a). A machine-learning decision tree (DT) was employed to identify specific quantitative critical thresholds associated with each phase. Results show that the SPB initial stage represented low-light intensity in early-April. The peak stage was determined by strong-light intensity; thus, the Chl-a increased rapidly in mid-April. The decline stage corresponded to a high sea surface temperature (SST[Formula: see text]14.40 °C) in May, while the termination stage indicated no SPB occurrence after late-May due to very-high SST ([Formula: see text]17.27 °C). We classified four SPB types from phenology and discussed the unique environmental characteristics of each type. SPB peak timing is set by the coupled physical oceanic structure (SST-mixing-light), whereas atmospheric inputs modulate bloom magnitude. The study provides a consistent baseline and a physically interpretable phenology-threshold approach for integrated interpretation of timing and conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.