ArticleScientific reports2026
An interactive cascaded deep learning framework with expert refinement for accurate striatal subregion segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate delineation of striatal subregions in brain MRI is essential for reliable dopaminergic PET quantification and the assessment of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. In this study, we introduce StriaSeg-iARM, a cascaded deep learning framework designed for high-precision segmentation of 12 anatomically defined striatal subregions in native space. The model employs a two-stage 3D residual U-Net architecture, where the first stage localizes the striatum and the second performs voxel-wise subregional classification. To improve segmentation accuracy in anatomically altered cases, the framework incorporates an intermediate refinement step, enabling expert correction of the striatal mask prior to final inference. The model was trained on multi-scanner T1-weighted MRI data and evaluated on both internal and external datasets, including real-world cases with striatal atrophy. Compared to atlas-based normalization, a conventional single-stage model, and a cascaded model without refinement, StriaSeg-iARM achieved superior segmentation performance, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.91. Furthermore, segmentation accuracy was enhanced through expert intervention without requiring model retraining. Quantitative PET analyses based on StriaSeg-iARM also exhibited improved agreement with expert-defined segmentations. Overall, these results demonstrate the practical applicability of StriaSeg-iARM as a flexible and extensible framework for subregional segmentation and PET quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.