Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606090›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A retrospective assessment of antimicrobial resistance patterns in WHO-access, watch, and reserve-classified antibiotics across two large hospitals in a resource-limited setting.

Ejikemeuwa Benedict Eya, Ogbeche Blessing Enyanwu, Otuto Amarauche Chukwu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ejikemeuwa Benedict EyaChemistry Unit, Central Research and Diagnostic laboratory, Ilorin, Nigeria. eya.benedict@gmail.com.
Ogbeche Blessing EnyanwuDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, FCT, Nigeria.
Otuto Amarauche ChukwuInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a significant threat. To ensure efficient use of antibiotics, the WHO AWaRe Antibiotics classification framework classifies antibiotics into three groups: Access, Watch, and Reserve. Tracking antibiotic resistance across these groups remains a critical task. This retrospective study examined the prevalence of resistance within the AWaRe Antibiotics classification framework in two large hospitals in Abuja Nigeria. A total of 14,423 microbial culture test results were sourced and retrieved from the hospitals between January and December 2023, of which 3,987 (27.64%) showed microbial growth and with antimicrobial susceptibility results. Six different sample types were analyzed, with urine samples (36.22%) yielding the highest number of isolates. Escherichia coli (23.78%) was the most identified microbe. The overall AMR rate across the AWaRe classification was 41.96%. For the Access category, highest resistance was reported for Doxycycline at 100% resistance while the lowest resistance was reported for Amikacin at 24.63%. For the Watch category, the highest resistance was reported for Cefuroxime at 85.71% while the lowest resistance was reported for ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and Netilmicin, both with 0% resistance. For the Reserve category, the highest resistance was reported for Aztreonam at 67.96% while the lowest resistance was reported for Polymixin B at 9.71%. Cumulatively, antimicrobials in the Access category had a resistance prevalence rate of 44.29%; those in the Watch category had a resistance prevalence rate of 46.65%; while those in the Reserve category had a resistance prevalence rate of 34.95%. More than 70% of multi-drug resistance was observed in frequently used antibiotics such as Cefuroxime, Ceftazidime, and Meropenem. Additionally, over 60% resistance was found in antibiotics like Ertapenem, Aztreonam, and Teicoplanin even though they are not readily available in Nigeria. Every microbe reported in this study was resistant to more than one antimicrobial agent. The most resistant microbes were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp., Streptococcus spp., and Escherichia coli. Across gender, positive isolates were found more in women than men across almost all the microbes identified. These results, based on real patient data, highlight the urgent need for an institutionalized AWaRe Antibiotics framework across healthcare facilities in addition to broader strategies of antimicrobial stewardship, pharmaceutical supply chain enhancement, and national AMR surveillance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliHospitalsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNigeriaResource-Limited SettingsRetrospective StudiesWorld Health OrganizationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID41606090
PMCPMC12909863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.