ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of vitamin E status among patients with newly diagnosed primary knee osteoarthritis in Cameroon.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine vitamin E status of patients newly diagnosed with KOA in Yaoundé (Cameroon). An analytical cross-sectional pilot study involving people aged ≥ 40 years, separated into two groups: participants with primary KOA diagnosed based on clinical and radiological elements in accordance with American Rheumatism Association 1986 criteria, and participants without KOA. All participants had a serum alpha-tocopherol assay. Factors associated with vitamin E deficit (˂ 250 µmol/100 mL) were identified in multivariate analysis using logistic regression and present with odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval. Vitamin E levels were compared according to the Kellgren & Lawrence radiological stage using Kruskal–Wallis’ test. The significance threshold was less than 0.05. The sample comprised 159 participants, aged 53.8 ± 10 years, 67.3% females and 52.8% with primary KOA. Vitamin E deficit was observed in 97.6% participants with KOA and 21.3% without KOA (p < 0.001). It was independently associated with an age ≥ 55 years (OR: 4.2 [1.43; 11.2], p = 0.01), and a frequent vitamin E-rich food consumption (OR: 0.05 [0.003; 0.09], p < 0.001). Vitamin E was significantly lower in participants with KOA comparing with those without (52.2 ± 71.4 versus 452.4 ± 230 µmol/mL, p ˂ 0.001). There was no association between vitamin E levels and Lequesne’s algofunctional index, in contrast to the radiological stage, where a significant decline in vitamin E was observed as the radiological stage progressed. With this high frequency of vitamin E deficiency strongly associated with the radiographic stage of primary KOA, future studies should evaluate its therapeutic implications specifically in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.