ArticleScientific reports2026
Disturbance event impact on aboveground carbon storage and vulnerability of large trees in old-growth coniferous forest stands in Latvia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large, old trees store a considerable part of the total carbon in old-growth forests; however, their influence on long-term climate change mitigation capacity remains unclear. Damage caused by wind and insect outbreaks can rapidly kill trees, and these natural events are expected to increase with climate change, thereby reducing the long-term carbon storage capacity of old-growth stands. The aim was to estimate the importance of large, old trees in carbon storage at the stand level and the potential risks for the carbon stock if they die. The data were collected from Scots pine and Norway spruce stands on mineral soils, of which 44 were old-growth stands, and 47 were mature stands two times younger than the former. Stand-level carbon storage in tree biomass was investigated; the presence of deadwood was analyzed. The carbon stock changes were calculated by excluding the 1-15 largest trees per sample plot. The results showed that the largest trees in old-growth coniferous stands hold a disproportionally large (~ 50% of the total tree biomass carbon pool) share of carbon compared to mature stands, ~ 50% and ~ 10%, respectively. A reduction of the tree biomass carbon pool by approximately 50% required a removal of around 30% more trees in mature than in old-growth stands. A relatively low proportion of deadwood from the total stand volume (~ 20%) suggests a limited single-tree mortality and vulnerable mitigation potential in the assessed old-growth stands. Nevertheless, continuous single-tree mortality due to ageing or windthrow re-shapes forest structure, and raises the potential risk of the stands to maintain and/or further increase substantial tree biomass-linked carbon pools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.