Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Maternal technoference decreases brain-to-brain synchrony during mother-infant interaction.

Marion I van den Heuvel, Agata Mosińska, Elise Turk, Maryam Alimardani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marion I van den HeuvelTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. m.i.vdnheuvel@tilburguniversity.edu.
Agata MosińskaDepartment of Cognitive Science and AI, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Elise TurkDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maryam AlimardaniDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VI.Veni.191G.025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face-to-face interactions between parents and infants are crucial for healthy infant development. In today's world, these interactions are frequently disrupted by parental distraction by technological devices, a phenomenon known as technoference. This study aimed to investigate the effects of technoference on mother-infant brain-to-brain synchrony - a measure for how well two brains are communicating. Previous research has shown that greater brain-to-brain synchrony may reflect higher sensitive caregiving, while lower synchrony reflects higher intrusive caregiving. A total of 33 mother-infant dyads participated in a modified Still-Face Paradigm incorporating maternal smartphone distraction. Dual-EEG was employed to measure mother-infant brain-to-brain synchrony which was subsequently quantified using weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI). Results revealed that, as expected, mother-infant brain-to-brain synchrony was decreased during the smartphone interruptions. Additionally, brain-to-brain synchrony between mother and infant went back to baseline during reunion. Overall, these findings align with previous research emphasizing the potential disruptive effect of smartphones in parent-infant interactions, but also suggest that mother-infant brain-to-brain synchrony can be restored when the mother re-engages in the interaction.

Indexed as

BrainMother-Child RelationsMothersSmartphoneAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantMaleBrain-to-brain synchronyEEG hyperscanningMother-infant interactionSmartphone useTechnoference

Identifiers

PMID41606046
PMCPMC12909859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.