ArticleScientific reports2026
Ecological and human health risks of potentially toxic elements across land uses in a dust-prone region of Central Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the ecological and human health risks related to potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in soils across five different land uses in a dust-prone area of central Iran. In total, 107 surface soil samples and 32 subsurface samples were collected from industrial areas, agricultural lands, rangelands, barren areas, and planted forests. The concentrations of Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Chromium (Cr), Zinc (Zn), Copper (Cu), and Vanadium (V) were measured, and ecological and health risks were assessed using the improved weighted index (IWI), hazard index (HI), and total cancer risk (TCR). The highest mean concentrations (mg/kg) of PTEs were observed in planted forests (As: 8.72; Cd: 0.45), industrial lands (Cd: 0.45; Cr: 18.3; Ni: 22.18; V: 32.83), and rangelands (As: 9.9; Cd: 0.45; Cu: 15.15; Pb: 12.45). Based on IWI, 33%, 47%, and 20% of soil samples were classified as unpolluted, low, and moderately polluted, respectively. The HI values for both adults and children were < 1, indicating no non-carcinogenic risk, while TCR values indicated potential carcinogenic risk, with the highest and lowest values in industrial areas (1.68 × 10⁻⁴) and agricultural lands (1.50 × 10⁻⁴), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that As in the planted forest had the highest contribution to the non-carcinogenic risk for adults and children, and Pb in rangelands had the highest contribution to the total carcinogenic risk. Since the study area is one of the areas prone to dust storms, the presence of PTEs, especially Cr, As, and Ni, may be pose additional risks to residents of these areas. Thus, regular monitoring of these pollutants in the soil of planted forests and appropriate management is recommended to reduce environmental and health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.