Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606033›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Electricity price forecasting with ensemble meta-models and SHAP explainers: a PCA-driven approach.

Amirhosein Hayati, Sina Samadi Gharehveran, Kimia Shirini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amirhosein HayatiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
Sina Samadi GharehveranDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Kimia ShiriniDepartment of Multimedia, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran. ki.shirini@tabriziau.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate electricity price forecasting is essential for optimizing market operations, enhancing resource allocation, and ensuring sustainable energy management in volatile and complex markets. This research introduces a comprehensive ensemble meta-modeling framework that integrates machine learning techniques with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for enhanced interpretability and PCA (Principal Component Analysis) for effective dimensionality reduction. The methodology capitalizes on the complementary strengths of predictive models such as XGBoost, LSTM, and CNN to address the non-linear and temporal intricacies of electricity price datasets. Two ensemble approaches were implemented: (1) Weighted Averaging, assigning weights inversely proportional to model RMSE, achieving an RMSE of 2.126761, and (2) Meta-Model Ensemble, employing Linear Regression, achieving superior accuracy with an RMSE of 1.939032. SHAP analysis provided actionable insights into model contributions, highlighting XGBoost and LSTM as key components. Furthermore, error trajectory analysis demonstrated the robustness of the ensembles in minimizing cumulative forecasting errors over time. This study contributes to the field by combining advanced machine learning models, ensemble strategies, and explainability frameworks to deliver an interpretable, high-performing electricity price forecasting system. The results inform policy-making and lay the foundation for scalable, data-driven energy market solutions.

Identifiers

PMID41606033
PMCPMC12909793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.