ArticleScientific reports2026
Community resilience to urban flooding across comparative neighborhoods in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As global climate change escalates and urban populations expand, natural disasters, including urban flooding, pose significant risks to rapidly urbanizing cities. Against this background, enhancing community resilience is widely recognized as one of the crucial approaches to mitigating the impact of disasters. Based on a survey in Chengdu, the Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART) assessment was employed to measure the perceived community resilience across three community types: urban, exurban, and suburban. 387 valid questionnaires were collected in this study, and the data were analyzed by using multiple linear regression analysis to explore the main influencing factors. Results indicate that: (1) Urban center residents reported the highest resilience perception, while those of the suburban community exhibited the lowest level. (2) Built environment characteristics contributed to intra-community variations in resilience perception. (3) Socio-demographic factors (e.g., age, income, education) and participation in disaster risk reduction (DRR) activities (particularly community volunteering and disaster drills) were significantly correlated with higher resilience scores. These findings highlight the significance of incorporating social capital and community involvement into urban resilience planning. Therefore, a “multi-sectoral approach” integrated framework is proposed for enhancing community resilience to cope with flooding and other disaster risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.