ArticleScientific reports2026
A Q-learning approach to waste rock reduction in open-pit mine design based on cleaner production principles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Responsible optimization of long-term production scheduling in open-pit mines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale metal mining operations extract vast quantities of ore and waste rock annually, generating both economic benefits and significant environmental challenges. While mining supports industrial growth, technological advancement, and job creation, it also imposes substantial social and ecological costs, particularly from the disposal of waste rock. These mine wastes increase the burden of handling, dumping, reclamation, and long-term monitoring, often undermining sustainability objectives. Reducing waste generation within ultimate pit limit design is therefore essential to align mining with sustainable development policies. This study develops a novel framework that integrates mathematical modeling with Q-learning, a reinforcement learning algorithm, to optimize ultimate pit limit by maximizing ore recovery and profitability while minimizing waste rock extraction. A key innovation of the model is the explicit inclusion of environmental costs, covering prevention, mitigation, and compensation of impacts, as a fundamental component of block economic value. The approach is validated using a large scale copper ore deposit, and compared against the widely used Lerchs-Grossmann algorithm. Results show that the Q-learning framework reduces waste rock extraction by 2.7 million tons, with about 0.5 million tons less ore recovered, while also lowering computational time from 7.2 to 5.8 h. Although Lerchs-Grossmann yields slightly higher profit, it ignores environmental costs, leading to less sustainable outcomes. Overall, the framework prioritizes realistic pit design over superior economic gains. By embedding environmental factors into mine planning, it enhances resource efficiency, minimizes ecological impacts, and promotes cleaner production, thereby advancing sustainability in mining through reinforcement learning-based optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.