ArticleScientific reports2026
Validation of a fast LC-MS/MS method for the analysis of bisphenol A (BPA) and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) in eluates of dental polymer-based materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer-based materials are widely used in dentistry. However, concerns exist regarding their biocompatibility because monomers such as urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) and bisphenol A (BPA) may leach from the materials and affect the immune and endocrine systems. Since BPA and UDMA are biologically active even at low concentrations, validated and highly sensitive analytical methods are required. We developed a fast LC-MS/MS method enabling simultaneous detection of BPA and UDMA in artificial saliva using a short column and polarity switching. The method was validated for selectivity, specificity, carry-over, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, recovery, and matrix effects. A water–methanol gradient elution with post-column infusion of 6 mM NH₄F was used to enhance sensitivity. Lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) for UDMA and BPA were of 10pg/ml and 30pg/ml, respectively. The method was used to analyze eluates of thermoformed and 3D-printed polymer-based materials, which released very low amounts of BPA and UDMA. In eluates collected after 1 day, the thermoformed material released more BPA (154.6 ± 128.7 pg/mL) and UDMA (154.8 ± 24.0 pg/mL) than the 3D-printed resin (BPA: 30.7 ± 16.4 pg/mL, UDMA: under LLOQ). Despite the high sensitivity, all values were lower than LLOQ in eluates collected after 1 week. The method provides a fast and reliable tool for the simultaneous quantification of BPA and UDMA in the eluates of dental polymer-based materials, enabling a more accurate assessment of the safety of these materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.