ArticleScientific reports2026
Clinical validation of lightweight CNN architectures for reliable multi-class classification of lung cancer using histopathological imaging techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- COOT-CNN: joint architecture and training-strategy optimization for binary colorectal histology patch classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A CLIP-based framework for multiclass lung histopathology classification with prompt engineering and class-imbalance-aware focal optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quantified immune-aging dysregulation index: a large-language model-powered method for annotating and quantifying systems-level dysregulation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- An explainable ResNet50-BiLSTM-attention framework with spatial token modeling and imbalance-aware learning for multi-class knee osteoarthritis severity grading.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- MLHNet-Lung: an attention-guided multi-level CNN-transformer fusion framework with CBAM and GeM pooling for explainable multiclass lung CT image classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and accurate early diagnosis plays a critical role in improving patient survival. In this study, a comparative analysis of multiple lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) variants is presented for multi-class lung cancer classification using histopathological images. Four CNN architectures were designed to systematically explore the trade-off between model complexity and classification performance. Each variant was trained and evaluated within a unified experimental framework incorporating data augmentation, class balancing via computed class weights, and a custom macro-F1-based early stopping callback to ensure stable and fair performance comparison. The models were trained on three histopathological classes, Lung Benign Tissue, Lung Adenocarcinoma, and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma. The training process involved automated generation of accuracy, loss, and validation F1 curves, along with confusion matrices for both validation and test datasets. To assess robustness, the best-performing model was evaluated across multiple random seeds and statistical significance was established using paired McNemar's tests against competing variants. Among the proposed variants, one model (Lite-V2) achieved superior macro-F1 performance and demonstrated strong generalization capability on unseen test data, confirming the effectiveness of lightweight CNNs in achieving high accuracy with reduced computational cost. This work highlights the potential of custom lightweight CNN architectures for efficient and reliable lung cancer classification, offering a reproducible framework that can be extended to larger datasets or adapted for clinical diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.