Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605999›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning approach for wheat variety identification using single-seed imaging.

Hossein Bagherpour, Siavash Shamohammadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hossein BagherpourDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. h.bagherpour@basu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-6281
Siavash ShamohammadiDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2916-4285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of wheat varieties is essential for seed certification and precision agriculture, yet traditional visual inspection is subjective, labor-intensive, and often unreliable due to the morphological similarity among cultivars. This study presents a comprehensive comparative framework for automated wheat varietal classification using both handcrafted and deep-learning-based feature extraction methods. A controlled imaging system was used to capture seed images from six Iranian wheat cultivars. Handcrafted morphological, color, and texture descriptors were extracted and reduced using principal component analysis (PCA) prior to classification using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP). In parallel, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained to learn deep features directly from raw images, and two classifier-head strategies-global average pooling (GAP) and fully connected layers (FCL)-were systematically compared. Hyperparameters were optimized through structured experimentation, and model stability was assessed using repeated training runs, one-way ANOVA, and 95% confidence intervals. Results show that the CNN-GAP model achieved the highest accuracy (92.19%) and demonstrated superior generalization stability compared with EfficientNet-B4 and Inception-ResNet-v2 models. PCA-based dimensionality reduction enhanced MLP performance, yielding 86.0% accuracy. Cross-domain testing on chickpea seeds highlighting sensitivity to domain shifts and emphasizing the need for species-specific training data. Practical considerations revealed that the lightweight CNN-GAP architecture, with an average inference time of 13.6 ms per image, is suitable for real-time deployment on low-cost agricultural hardware.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningSeedsTriticumClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksMultilayer PerceptronsPrincipal Component AnalysisCNNDeep learningSeed classificationWheat variety

Identifiers

PMID41605999
PMCPMC12910013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.