ArticleScientific reports2026
Solid oxide fuel cell simulation model tuning using operating conditions dependent optimization techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper discusses the mathematical model and simulation of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), where the conventional and reversible SOFC are studied. Their performance is studied at the steady state to get the V-I polarization curves, as well as in case of changing the electric current drawn from the cell to get the change in voltage over time. Unlike most existing studies, the focus is on the time needed by the cell to reach voltage stability after a change, in preparation for studying the cell integration into an electrical network, and all of these studies are carried out when changing the cell operating conditions such as temperatures and the flow rate of reactive gases. Then optimization techniques are used, such as Walrus Optimization Algorithm (WaOA), Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm (SBOA), Chaos Game Optimization (CGO) and Teaching-Learning Based Optimization (TLBO) to increase model accuracy and make its results closer to the published laboratory results. The results demonstrate that WaOA achieves the lowest modeling error among the investigated optimization techniques and provides the most accurate model calibration. The proposed WaOA-based tuning reduces the modeling error by more than five orders of magnitude compared to curve-fitting approaches reported in the literature, and is further employed to optimize reactant flow rates, resulting in an output power increase of approximately 6% compared to nominal operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.