ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of electrocardiography interpretation competency of Ethiopian medical interns: a multi-site study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is critical for early diagnosis of cardiac conditions, yet competency among medical interns in Ethiopia remains understudied. While an earlier study offered initial insights, it was limited to two institutions. This multi-site study aimed to provide a more current and comprehensive assessment of ECG interpretation skills and associated factors among Ethiopian medical interns. A multi-site cross-sectional study was conducted with 220 interns from four randomly selected institutions. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire, adapted from validated instruments, and analyzed using SPSS 25. Competency was defined as scoring ≥ 80% on a 14-item ECG interpretation test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify determinants of competency. A statistically significant P-value was set at less than 0.05. The overall competency rate was 19.1%, with significant institutional variation (p < 0.001), ranging from 7.1% to 32.7%. Confidence in ECG interpretation (AOR = 9.10, 95% CI: 1.22–12.67) and emergency department (ED) rotations during clinical years (AOR = 3.87, 95% CI: 1.86–8.05) and internship (AOR = 4.07, 95% CI: 1.68–9.85) were key predictors of competency. This study highlights a persistent low competency in ECG interpretation among Ethiopian medical interns. These findings highlight the importance of structured ECG training, incorporating dedicated ED rotations, and building self-confidence through practical, simulation-based learning to improve skills and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.