Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605966›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Four learning phases in cataract surgery revealed by complication rates among novice surgeons at a Japanese teaching center.

Hitoshi Tabuchi, Tomofusa Yamauchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hitoshi TabuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Aboshi Waku, Himeji, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan. h.tabuchi@tsukazaki-eye.net.
Tomofusa YamauchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Aboshi Waku, Himeji, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataract surgery education requires balancing surgical training with patient safety, yet the precise phases of surgical skill development remain unclear. Here we analyze 4255 cataract surgeries performed by 15 novice surgeons to identify distinct phases in the learning curve based on complication rates. Using a custom smoothing filter and the PELT (Pruned Exact Linear Time) algorithm, we identified four distinct phases: Phase 1 (cases 1–87) with a complication rate of 3.18% (95% CI 3.13–3.24%), Phase 2 (cases 88–189) with 1.68% (95% CI 1.52–1.85%), Phase 3 (cases 190–534) with 0.79% (95% CI 0.77–0.81%), and Phase 4 (cases 535–711) with 0.18% (95% CI 0.16–0.20%). The experience speed stabilized after approximately 123 cases, and novice surgeons required 535 cases to achieve complication rates comparable to experienced surgeons (0.53%). Notably, surgeons with less than 535 cases accounted for 40.9% of all complications in our educational setting. The overall complication rate for the first 50 cases was 3.1%, lower than previously reported international rates (4.8–11.6%). These findings provide statistical evidence for the stages of surgical proficiency development and suggest that structured training programs should be tailored to these distinct learning phases to optimize surgical outcomes and patient safety.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionLearning CurvePostoperative ComplicationsSurgeonsClinical CompetenceEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41605966
PMCPMC12855178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.