ArticleScientific reports2026
Four learning phases in cataract surgery revealed by complication rates among novice surgeons at a Japanese teaching center.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cataract surgery education requires balancing surgical training with patient safety, yet the precise phases of surgical skill development remain unclear. Here we analyze 4255 cataract surgeries performed by 15 novice surgeons to identify distinct phases in the learning curve based on complication rates. Using a custom smoothing filter and the PELT (Pruned Exact Linear Time) algorithm, we identified four distinct phases: Phase 1 (cases 1–87) with a complication rate of 3.18% (95% CI 3.13–3.24%), Phase 2 (cases 88–189) with 1.68% (95% CI 1.52–1.85%), Phase 3 (cases 190–534) with 0.79% (95% CI 0.77–0.81%), and Phase 4 (cases 535–711) with 0.18% (95% CI 0.16–0.20%). The experience speed stabilized after approximately 123 cases, and novice surgeons required 535 cases to achieve complication rates comparable to experienced surgeons (0.53%). Notably, surgeons with less than 535 cases accounted for 40.9% of all complications in our educational setting. The overall complication rate for the first 50 cases was 3.1%, lower than previously reported international rates (4.8–11.6%). These findings provide statistical evidence for the stages of surgical proficiency development and suggest that structured training programs should be tailored to these distinct learning phases to optimize surgical outcomes and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.