Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605943›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

The representation of omitted sounds in the mouse auditory cortex.

Janek Peters, Zhongnan Cai, Maxime van Veghel, Andreas Knoben, Maikel Simon, Samuel Arends, Francesco Paolo Battaglia, Bernhard Englitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janek Peters *Computational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Zhongnan Cai *Computational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maxime van VeghelComputational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andreas KnobenComputational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7636-3244
Maikel SimonComputational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Samuel ArendsComputational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Francesco Paolo BattagliaComputational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-8875
Bernhard EnglitzComputational Neuroscience Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. bernhard.englitz@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-0356

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 833964Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation) 2919.02National Science Foundation (NSF) PHY-1748958Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 016.VIDI.189.052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals use predictions to optimize their behavior, however, the underlying neuronal implementation remains elusive. We address this using omitted sounds on the macro- and microscale of the auditory cortex of female, normal hearing mice using high-speed imaging. Neuronal responses to the omission of expected sounds were time-locked to expected stimulus onset, localized to layer 1-4 of higher auditory area (Temporal Association Area, TeA), and continued to rise until the following stimulus. The omission responses differed from offset and deviant responses in their temporal shape, size and spatial localization. Omissions and sequence statistics correlated with behavioral changes by timed pupil dilation and rapid facial motions. While stimulus responses showed partial entrainment, omission responses maintained a distinct, unentrained shape. The localized omission response in TeA is consistent with a hierarchical organization of predictive processing. However, the continued rise suggests an integrated, absolute prediction error, instead of a direct representation of prediction or prediction error, which would terminate with the omission.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsSound

Identifiers

PMID41605943
PMCPMC12953763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.