ArticleCell discovery2026
Integrative clinico-molecular analysis reveals actionable subtypes and biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cell discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deeper insights into omics in the clinical and tumor microenvironments of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) could reveal therapy-sensitive subtypes and novel treatments. From a cohort of 1008 samples from Chinese patients with LUAD with whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing data along with comprehensive longitudinal clinical and therapeutic information, we identified four prognostically distinct subtypes, namely, low proliferation and invasion (LPI), immune-desert (IMD), immune-enriched (IME), and high proliferation and invasion (HPI), based on the transcriptomic features linked to the radiological, pathological, and microenvironmental dimensions. Compared with chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy demonstrated significantly superior efficacy for LPI and IMD, whereas no such difference was observed for HPI. VOPP1 and RRM2B amplification were closely associated with TKI resistance and sensitivity, respectively. VOPP1 knockdown restored sensitivity to TKI treatment, while RRM2B knockdown induced TKI resistance, and its overexpression restored sensitivity. Patients with RRM2B amplification had a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Additionally, the IME subtype exhibited higher immune checkpoint activity and a higher frequency of DYNC2H1 mutation, with patients benefiting from immunotherapy. These findings provide critical insights into LUAD treatment optimization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.