ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH2026
Efficacy of venetoclax combined with azacitidine for advanced blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: experience from two Japanese cases.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive hematologic malignancy with no established standard treatment. Recently, the combination of venetoclax (VEN) and azacitidine (Aza) has shown promising efficacy in elderly or unfit patients; however, clinical data in Japanese patients remain limited. We report two Japanese cases with BPDCN that responded favorably to VEN plus Aza therapy. The first case involved a 50-year-old man who relapsed shortly after Hyper-CVAD/MA therapy with leukemic transformation. Despite requiring dose reductions due to prolonged cytopenia and infections, he achieved a complete response after eight cycles of VEN plus Aza. The second case was an 81-year-old man with widespread skin and bone marrow lesions. He showed a marked clinical response after only 7 days of treatment, although therapy was discontinued due to COVID-19 infection. Both cases demonstrate that VEN plus Aza therapy can induce rapid and clinically meaningful responses even in short or attenuated regimens in patients with refractory or elderly BPDCN. However, cytopenias and infections are significant limitations, warranting that individualized dosing may be necessary depending on patient characteristics, including ethnicity and body size. Our findings support the consideration of VEN plus Aza as a feasible therapeutic option for patients with BPDCN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.