Observational studyEndocrine journal2026
Use, efficacy, and safety of desmopressin for congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in children: a nationwide survey.
Observational study in Endocrine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (CNDI) is characterized by resistance of the distal nephrons and collecting ducts to arginine vasopressin (AVP). High doses of 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP), a V2-receptor-selective agonist, are effective in some cases. The present study aimed to demonstrate the use, efficacy, and safety of DDAVP and the characteristics of patients who responded to this treatment. The present, retrospective, multicentric, observational survey of patients with CNDI receiving DDAVP was based on a previous, nationwide survey conducted by the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology (JSPE) and collected data on the use (formulation, dosage, and treatment duration), efficacy (change in urine output and height SDS), and safety of DDAVP. In the initial survey, 43 of 123 JSPE council members (35.0%) observed the patients. The secondary survey of 13 patients found DDAVP to be effective in five patients (38.5%), as evidenced by a 12.6-31.6% decrease in urine output. The maximum urine osmolality on a water deprivation test and urine osmolality after vasopressin injection were lower in patients who were unresponsive to DDAVP than in those who were responsive to the drug (106 vs. 206 mOsm/H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.