ArticleIndustrial health2026
Evaluation of respiratory toxicity and peritoneal mesothelioma induced by heat-treated and milled amosite following intratracheal and intraperitoneal injection in rats.
Article in Industrial health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amoste is highly carcinogenic, and its incomplete removal from the environment continues to pose significant health risks. High temperatures are known to alter the crystal structure of asbestos. In this study, we evaluated the carcinogenicity and respiratory toxicity of heat-treated amosite (AM-1000; heated at 1,000°C) and its milled derivative (AM-1000G; heat-treated at 1,000°C and milled), using untreated amosite as a positive control. Physicochemical analyses confirmed that AM-1000G predominantly consisted of non-asbestiform structures with an aspect ratio of less than 3. In a single intratracheal administration study in rats (2 mg; observation period up to 540 d), AM-1000G induced much less severe acute and chronic pulmonary inflammation than amosite or AM-1000 and did not cause fibrosis. No pulmonary adenoma, lung cancer, or pleural mesothelioma was observed in any group. Following intraperitoneal administration (10 mg; two-year observation period), peritoneal mesotheliomas developed in 56% (14/25) of rats in the amosite group, whereas only one (1/25) rat in the AM-1000 group developed mesotheliomas. In contrast, no peritoneal mesothelioma was observed in the AM-1000G group. This study demonstrated that AM-1000G is non-carcinogenic and exhibits markedly reduced acute and chronic respiratory toxicity. These findings provide the first scientific evidence supporting the feasibility of amosite detoxification through heat treatment, based on its biological evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.