Observational studyThorax2026
Time to next procedure in patients with malignant pleural effusion undergoing aspiration: derivation and initial validation of the RED score.
Observational study in Thorax, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound assessment of pleural effusion volume in clinical practice: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPE), pleural fluid reaccumulates at variable rates following therapeutic aspiration. The aim of this study was to identify variables which predict time to next procedure and use them to develop a predictive score.
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study in 10 British hospitals recruited patients with known or suspected malignant effusions undergoing therapeutic aspiration. Follow-up lasted 3 months and assessed time to next clinically indicated pleural procedure. Regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables predicting time to next procedure, and a score derived. Initial validation was done in two external cohorts. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
results241 patients were recruited. Within the derivation cohort (n=180), baseline respiratory rate (R), pleural effusion depth on ultrasound (E) and dyspnoea measured using a visual analogue scale (D) (combined to form the RED score) were independent predictors of time to next procedure. Predictive models provided areas under the receiver operator curve of 0.73 and 0.75. Initial validity testing in two cohorts (n=31, n=57) demonstrated reasonable predictive value.
conclusionsIn patients with MPE, baseline respiratory rate, pleural effusion depth on ultrasound and dyspnoea predict time to next procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16567838.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.