Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605643›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026

Utilization Growth and Reimbursement Decline in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis Using National Medicare Data From 2012 to 2024.

Hannah Shelby, Michael S Kim, Joseph Shelby, Will Karakash, Henry Avetisian, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, R Kiran Alluri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah ShelbyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA hshelby@usc.edu.
Michael S KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA.
Joseph ShelbyStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Will KarakashDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Henry AvetisianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey C WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raymond J HahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
R Kiran AlluriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpine disorders are among the most common causes of disability, with utilization of spine procedures nearly doubling over the past 2 decades. As costs have continued to escalate, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have implemented bundled care initiatives and reimbursement reductions, leading to declining physician payment. This study provides a comprehensive summary of utilization and reimbursement for the most common spine procedures using a large national insurance database.

methodsPatient data from 2010 to 2021 were accessed by querying the national insurance claims database using Current Procedural Terminology codes. After identifying the 10 most used spine procedures, the Physician Fee-Schedule Lookup Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was queried to obtain Medicare physician reimbursement for the procedures (2012-2024). Dollar values were adjusted using the Consumer Price Index and are reported in 2024 US dollars. Yearly reimbursement was separated by procedure type and location. Utilization trends and demographic data were also obtained.

resultsFrom 2012 to 2021, 347,053 Medicare patients underwent 1 of the top 10 spine procedures, with fusion, laminectomy, and laminotomy being the most utilized. The average patient was 69 ± 8 years; 52.9% were women, with an average Elixhauser Comorbidity Index of 4.9 ± 3.7. Overall utilization increased by 19% (

conclusionDespite the growing utilization of all included procedures, the present data have demonstrated a decrease in Medicare reimbursement across all subgroups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These reimbursement trends shape the field of spine surgery, impacting the sustainability of spine practices, affecting patient access to care, and influencing the adoption of new technologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

health care utilizationMedicare reimbursementneurosurgeryorthopedic surgeryspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID41605643
PMCPMC13036443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.