ArticleBMJ open2026
Development of a machine learning-based model for prediction of diabetes risk in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy of PPAR agonists in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a leading chronic liver disorder closely linked to diabetes mellitus (DM) and its cardiovascular and renal complications. Early identification of diabetes risk in this population is essential for timely intervention.
objectiveTo develop machine learning (ML) models to predict diabetes risk in individuals with MASLD and to identify key predictive factors using a nationally representative dataset.
methodsData from 6310 MASLD participants (2007-2018) were analysed and classified into DM and non-DM groups. Feature selection was performed using Random Forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination. Based on selected features, nine ML models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, area under the curve, F1 score, Rank Score and Brier Score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability.
resultsEight key variables (age, urinary albumin (Ualb), total cholesterol (TC), lipid accumulation product (LAP), urinary creatinine, white blood cell count, uric acid and Visceral Adiposity Index) were identified and used for model construction. Among nine algorithms, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model showed superior predictive performance. SHAP analysis revealed that Ualb, age, TC and LAP were the most influential predictors.
conclusionOur ML-based model effectively identifies individuals with MASLD at high risk for developing DM. The LightGBM algorithm outperformed other models in both accuracy and interpretability. Key predictors such as Ualb and LAP highlight the importance of renal and metabolic markers in early diabetes risk prediction, offering a new approach for individualised intervention and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.