Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605595›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Femoral versus radial arterial pressure monitoring in cardiac surgery patients: protocol for a randomised controlled multicentric superiority trial (FERARI).

Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Romain Bronnert, Tommy Grelet, Belaid Bouhemad, Maxime Nguyen, Guillaume Besch, FERARI study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06952907 (Femoral Versus Radial Artery Catheterization for Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06952907 narecruitingnot on this map

Femoral Versus Radial Artery Catheterization for Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery Patients: the FERARI Randomized Superiority Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuillaume BESCHRan2025 to 2027Enrolled340ConditionsVasoplegia Syndrome, Vasoplegia, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Arterial PressureArmsFemoral artery catheterization for continuous invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, Radial artery catheterization for continuous invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierre-Grégoire GuinotDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne François Mitterrand Hospital, Dijon, France.
Romain BronnertUniversité Marie et Louis Pasteur, SINERGIES (EA 4662), Besançon, France.
Tommy GreletUniversité Marie et Louis Pasteur, Besançon, France.
Belaid BouhemadDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne François Mitterrand Hospital, Dijon, France.
Maxime NguyenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne François Mitterrand Hospital, Dijon, France.
Guillaume BeschUniversité Marie et Louis Pasteur, SINERGIES (EA 4662), Besançon, France gbesch@chu-besancon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-4754
FERARI study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate arterial pressure monitoring is critical in cardiac surgery to guide haemodynamic management and vasopressor therapy. Radial arterial pressure monitoring may systematically underestimate central aortic pressure compared with femoral monitoring, potentially leading to inappropriate vasopressor escalation and associated complications. Recent evidence demonstrates that excessive norepinephrine exposure is associated with acute kidney injury and increased mortality in cardiac surgery patients.

objectiveTo determine whether femoral arterial pressure monitoring reduces norepinephrine use compared with radial monitoring in cardiac surgery patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, superiority trial conducted at two French university hospitals (CHU Besançon and CHU Dijon). Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be randomised 1:1 to receive either femoral or radial arterial pressure monitoring. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients treated with norepinephrine from anaesthetic induction to postoperative day 7. Secondary endpoints include acute kidney injury according to KDIGO criteria, cardiac complications, vasoactive-inotropic scores, duration of vasopressor therapy, vascular complications, and 7-day and 30-day mortality. Sample size calculation indicates 340 patients (170 per group) are needed to detect a 15% absolute reduction in norepinephrine use with 90% power and α=0.05, and an anticipated loss to follow-up rate of 5%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the French Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest II, no. 2024/897) and will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06952907.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemoral ArteryMonitoring, IntraoperativeRadial ArteryAcute Kidney InjuryEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFranceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNorepinephrineProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAcute renal failureAnaesthesia in cardiologyBlood PressureCardiac surgeryHemodynamicsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID41605595
PMCPMC12853472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.