Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605589›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

The PROTECT trial: Effect of titrated versus conventional induction of general anaesthesia using a target-controlled infusion system on haemodynamics in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery - protocol for a multicentre, expertise-based randomised controlled trial.

Simon Funk, Martin Dominik Lohri, Andrea Kopp Lugli, Christian Schindler, Andrea Wiencierz, Kristian Mnich, Martin Schläpfer, Alexander Peter Gaberdiel, Milo Alan Puhan, Luzius A Steiner and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06980688 (Multicentre Single-blinded, Expertise-based RCT Comparing Haemodynamic Parameters Between Titration and Conventional Induction of General Anaesthesia With Target-controlled Infusion System in Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06980688 narecruitingnot on this map

Multicentre Single-blinded, Expertise-based RCT Comparing Haemodynamic Parameters Between Titration and Conventional Induction of General Anaesthesia With Target-controlled Infusion System in Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2025 to 2027Enrolled320ConditionsAnesthesiaArmsPropofol titration, Conventional propofol induction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon Funk *Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0242-7060
Martin Dominik Lohri *Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland martin.lohri@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3204-2262
Andrea Kopp LugliDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Christian SchindlerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-7613
Andrea WiencierzDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8786-7915
Kristian MnichDepartment of Perioperative Medicine (Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Prehospital Emergency Medicine), Kantonsspital Olten, Olten, Switzerland.
Martin SchläpferDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
Alexander Peter GaberdielAnesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Milo Alan PuhanEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luzius A SteinerAnesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nuno V Gomes *Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-0073
Salome Dell-Kuster *Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-7138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypotension is a frequent complication after induction of general anaesthesia leading to end-organ injury, for which elderly and multimorbid patients are particularly susceptible. The extent of hypotension depends, among other factors, on the dose and rate of propofol administration. Target-controlled infusion systems are widely used to administer short-acting anaesthetics such as propofol and remifentanil. Commonly, induction is started with a fixed effect-site concentration. Titration, an alternative method of induction using an incremental augmentation of propofol, leads to a reduced induction dose and rate of propofol. We hypothesise that the titration method improves haemodynamic stability compared with conventional induction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, expertise-based randomised controlled trial takes place at four Swiss hospitals. Patients ≥55 years of age undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia using propofol target-controlled infusion are randomised to either a conventional or a titrated anaesthesia induction method. Patients, statisticians and, if resources allow, outcome assessors will be blinded. The primary endpoint is the mean arterial pressure under the individual baseline mean arterial pressure (area under threshold) during the first 30 min after start of induction. Secondary endpoints include the maximum deviation from baseline mean arterial pressure, haemodynamic rescue methods, propofol consumption and neurocognitive recovery after regaining consciousness.A total of 320 patients are required to have an 80% chance of observing superiority of titration for the area under the threshold as significant at the 5% level, assuming a true difference of 100 mm Hg*min. The area under threshold and the maximum deviation will be compared between arms using mixed linear regression models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from all responsible ethics committees (BASEC2025-01007). The results will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals and may contribute to a change in clinical practice for anaesthesia induction using target-controlled infusion systems with propofol. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06980688) and www.humanforschung-schweiz.ch (HumRes67022).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousHemodynamicsHypotensionPropofolAgedFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwitzerlandAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolAdult anaesthesiaAgedHemodynamicsPropofol

Identifiers

PMID41605589
PMCPMC12853554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.