Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605588›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of free door-to-door transport to increase the uptake of breast screening appointments in Yorkshire: a cluster randomised GP feasibility trial (DOORSTEP protocol).

Mahboobeh Haji Sadeghi, Judith Cohen, Olufikayo Bamidele, Helen Roberts, Bronwen Williams, Beccy Acaster, Hannah Miles, Chao Huang, Lukas Pitel, Bryony Dawkins and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mahboobeh Haji SadeghiUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK mahboobeh.hajisadeghi@hyms.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-6933
Judith CohenUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1538-3521
Olufikayo BamideleUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Helen RobertsUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Bronwen WilliamsUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Beccy AcasterUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Hannah MilesUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Chao HuangUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-7218
Lukas PitelUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Bryony DawkinsUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-1975
Wessam AbassUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Lesley PeacockHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Una MacleodUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Charlotte KellyUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast screening uptake remains low in parts of the UK, partly due to barriers including limited transport access. Offering free transport to screening appointments may help address this and improve uptake. This general practitioner (GP) cluster-randomised feasibility trial will assess whether offering free door-to-door transport alongside routine screening invitations increases attendance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eight general practices in Yorkshire will be randomised to either the intervention (routine invitation plus information about booking free door-to-door transport) or control (routine invitation only) group. Around 8000 women due for routine breast screening will be included. Primary feasibility outcomes include GP recruitment and randomisation, intervention fidelity, proportion of women from the 10% most deprived areas, acceptability and data transfer processes. Secondary outcomes include understanding travel behaviour, cost-effectiveness and screening uptake. Data will be collected from routine National Health Service (NHS) screening records, data linkage with NHS England, travel surveys and qualitative interviews exploring experiences and acceptability. Patient and public involvement is embedded throughout with members contributing to advisory and oversight roles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has received ethical approval from the London-Harrow Research Ethics Committee, Section 251 approval from the Confidentiality Advisory Group and other relevant regulatory bodies. The University of Hull is the study sponsor. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and plain English summaries for participants and the public. Findings will inform the feasibility and design of a potential larger trial to improve breast screening uptake via transport support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17087898.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth Services AccessibilityMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareTransportationCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMammographyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomBreast imagingEarly Detection of CancerGeneral PracticeMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID41605588
PMCPMC12853533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.