ArticleBMJ global health2026
TRIPS flexibilities help change policy and practice to increase access to medicines: evidence from 2001 to 2024.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMillions of people lack access to safe and effective pharmaceuticals because they are unaffordable or unavailable, particularly in 'developing' and 'least-developed' countries (DCs, LDCs), and increasingly in high-income countries (HICs). Management of intellectual property (IP) related to new medicines has a significant impact on access to safe, affordable and effective medicines. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) provides the international legal framework for IP protection and mandates 20-year patents in all technological fields, including pharmaceuticals. TRIPS contains flexibilities, such as compulsory licensing (CL) and transition provisions for LDCs, which governments can use to facilitate access to health technologies. The use of these flexibilities is underreported in the literature, and a thorough analysis has not been undertaken since the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA scoping review of three medical and legal databases and temporal analysis of all known instances of use or potential use of CLs and the LDC pharmaceutical transition measure between 2001-2024.
results61% of the 149 CL instances were executed. The relative rates of CL use between countries have shifted: HICs represent over half of CL instances in the last decade. CLs are increasingly considered for chronic, non-communicable and rare diseases. The threat of CL use continues to provide impetus for price negotiations, voluntary licences or other measures to improve access. Almost all eligible countries have invoked the right to use the LDC transition measure.
conclusionsTRIPS flexibilities have been used to facilitate access to medicines (including vaccines) over the quarter-century since the adoption of the World Trade Organization's Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health. The flexibilities play a vital role in ensuring that new medicines are affordable and are likely to continue to be in a future where geopolitical forces have drastically altered the financing structures of medicines provision in DCs and LDCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.