Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605506›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2026

"It Felt Good to Be Able to Say That Out Loud"-Therapeutic Alliance and Processes in AVATAR Therapy for People Who Hear Distressing Voices: Peer-Led Qualitative Study.

Emily Rutter-Eley, Thomas Craig, Philippa Garety, Mar Rus-Calafell, Hannah Ball, Moya Clancy, Jeffrey McDonnell, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Emily Rutter-EleyDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-7689
Thomas CraigSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-0391
Philippa GaretyDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-1340
Mar Rus-CalafellDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-3875
Hannah BallDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1178-5080
Moya ClancySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9730-4929
Jeffrey McDonnellResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1298-0945
Andrew GumleySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-938X
Gillian HaddockDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-5774
Sandra BucciDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-5333
Miriam Fornells-AmbrojoResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-5675
Nerys BaldwinThe AVATAR2 PPI Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5395-0362
Jed HarlingThe AVATAR2 PPI Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7431-4998
Alie PhiriThe AVATAR2 PPI Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7093-8550
Charlie MacKenzie-NashThe AVATAR2 PPI Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7766-4647
Nicholas HamiltonThe AVATAR2 PPI Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3529-3814
Amy GrantThe AVATAR2 PPI Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8543-1187
Clementine Edwards *Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9949-2401
Thomas Ward *Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-5755

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAVATAR therapy is a novel psychological therapy that aims to reduce distress associated with hearing voices. The approach involves a series of therapist-facilitated dialogues between a voice-hearer and a digital embodiment of their main distressing voice (the avatar), which aim to increase coping and self-empowerment.

objectiveThis study explored therapeutic processes that are distinctive to AVATAR therapy, including direct early work with voice content and the role of the therapist in dialogue enactment.

methodsPeople with lived experience relating to psychosis (peer researchers) contributed to each stage of the study. Peer researchers led semistructured interviews, which were conducted with 19 participants who received AVATAR therapy as part of the AVATAR2 trial, including 3 participants who dropped out of therapy. Data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (n=5) and template analysis (n=14).

resultsParticipants described the initial challenges of experiential work with distressing voice content; however, most reported a meaningful increase in power and control over the course of dialogues and improvements with voices in daily life. A strong therapeutic alliance was experienced by all participants, including those who chose to discontinue therapy, often mitigating the discomfort associated with initial challenges by enhancing their sense of safety. Several important themes relating to individual engagement were highlighted, such as the emotional intensity of the experience and the importance of participants' determination and open-minded attitudes despite initial doubts. Those who decided not to continue with therapy described challenges with the realism of working dialogically with a digital representation of their distressing voice.

conclusionsThis study has provided a deeper understanding of the experience of engaging in AVATAR therapy, in particular the challenges and opportunities of direct work with voice content. The importance of therapeutic alliance and establishing a sense of voice presence has been emphasized. Implications for the planned optimization and wider implementation of AVATAR therapy in routine care settings are discussed.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN55682735; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN55682735.

Indexed as

HallucinationsPsychotherapyPsychotic DisordersAdultAvatarFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeer GroupQualitative ResearchYoung Adultauditory hallucinationsAVATAR therapypeer researchpsychosisqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41605506
PMCPMC12895157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.