Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41605290›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Comparative genomics reveals two major lineages of Bifidobacterium adolescentis in the human gut, driven by divergent adaptation in China and the United States.

Linbo Shi, Meng Zhang, Ruonan Zheng, Lai-Yu Kwok, Wenyi Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linbo ShiKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Meng ZhangKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Ruonan ZhengKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Lai-Yu KwokKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Wenyi ZhangKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China. Electronic address: zhangwenyizi@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBifidobacterium adolescentis is a key beneficial member of the human gut microbiota, but its genomic diversity and evolutionary drivers across human populations remain poorly characterized.

objectivesUnderstanding genomic functional heterogeneity and evolutionary patterns in human gut-derived B. adolescentis.

methodsWe performed a comparative genomic analysis of 395 B. adolescentis, mainly from China (n = 169) and the United States (n = 146), with smaller sets from Australia, Italy, and the United Kingdom, to investigate functional heterogeneity and evolutionary mechanisms. Our analysis integrated core and pan-genome architecture, phylogenomics, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based population structure, carbohydrate-active enzyme profiles, CRISPR-Cas systems, antibiotic resistance genes, and recombination dynamics.

resultsThe pan-genome was open and highly plastic. Phylogenetic reconstruction identified two major clades with strong geographic stratification: Chinese isolates predominantly clustered in Clade B, while U.S. isolates grouped in Clade A. Functional annotation showed regional specialization in carbohydrate-active enzymes, with Chinese isolates enriched in glycosyltransferase families and U.S. isolates in carbohydrate-binding module and carboxylesterase families, likely reflecting dietary adaptations. Genomic islands were hotspots for horizontal gene transfer, harboring region-specific carbohydrate-active enzymes and antibiotic resistance genes such as tet(W/32/O) and ermX, which were frequently located in Chinese isolates. Recombination was found to be the primary driver of genetic diversity, with recombination-to-mutation ratios approaching and exceeding 3.0 in Chinese and U.S. isolates. Linkage disequilibrium decay further supported higher recombination rates in these populations.

conclusionB. adolescentis has diverged into two major genomic lineages, primarily associated with isolates from China and the U.S. This divergence reflects adaptation to distinct host-associated ecological factors, such as diet, antibiotic exposure, and lifestyle, and is predominantly driven by extensive homologous recombination rather than point mutations. These findings highlight how regional selective pressures shape the genomic and functional landscape of this key gut symbiont.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBifidobacteriumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome, BacterialGenomicsChinaEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHumansPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUnited StatesAntibiotics resistance geneCarbohydrate metabolismGenomic diversityGeographic adaptationHorizontalgene transferMobile genetic elementsRecombination

Identifiers

PMID41605290
PMCPMC13669602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.