ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
Artificial intelligence revolution in shoulder magnetic resonance imaging: current evidence and future directions for rotator cuff diagnosis.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who Is the Surgeon Now: Human Hands or Machine Minds? Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics from Diagnosis to Follow-Up-A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a leading cause of shoulder pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for diagnosis, but interpretation is limited by variable sensitivity, interobserver variability, and increasing workload. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including deep learning and large language models (LLMs), have been explored to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. A structured search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases identified studies published from 2019 or later applying AI to shoulder MRI for RCT detection, classification, segmentation, or reporting. Eligible studies reported quantitative outcomes. Of 732 records, 584 were screened, 121 underwent full-text review, and 19 were included in this narrative review. Deep learning models demonstrated diagnostic accuracies ranging from 71% to 100%, with sensitivities of 73%-100% and specificities of 70%-100%. About 20% of included studies used external validation, with 5%-15% performance reductions, underscoring limited generalizability. Visual Geometry Group (VGG)-based architectures and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) using multiplanar inputs achieved higher performance for full-thickness tear detection, while radiomics contributed to assessment of tear severity and muscle quality. Regulatory-approved software remains limited, and no fully automated diagnostic system has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance. LLMs demonstrated potential in patient education and report drafting, though informational quality was variable (median DISCERN score, 40/80), requiring expert oversight. AI applications in shoulder MRI demonstrate promising diagnostic accuracy and potential workflow benefits, but current evidence is constrained by limited external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and lack of regulatory clearance. Future research should prioritize multicenter validation, clinical integration, and explainability to enable safe clinical use of AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.