ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2026
Effects of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis on Intact Joint Biomechanics Across Sustained Activities of Daily Life: A Case Series.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Controlling Powered Prosthesis Joint Impedance Over Continuous Stance Transitions Between Walking and Stair Ascent/Descent.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower-limb prosthesis users often overuse their intact joints due to the lack of positive work generated by their devices. This overreliance has been shown to increase joint loading, degeneration, and pain. While powered prostheses can generate positive work and therefore reduce this burden, clinical studies of commercialized single-joint devices have demonstrated inconsistent results. Recently, prototype powered knee and ankle prostheses have shown more consistent advantages over passive devices in laboratory settings. Most of the studies, however, focus on the biomechanics of the prosthesis rather than its impact on the user's joints, study isolated activities, and/or do not replicate the demands of continuous real-world use. This case series analyzes the intact joint moments and work for N=3 above-knee amputee subjects using a powered knee-ankle prosthesis vs. their prescribed passive device during a continuous, sustained sequence of the primary activities of daily life. The powered prosthesis decreased peak hip flexion moment (but increased peak extension moment) during level walking, and decreased peak knee extension moment for all other activities. For at least two of the three subjects, the powered prosthesis decreased total positive work across the intact joints during ascent activities (stair ascent, sit-to-stand) and decreased negative total work for descent activities (stair descent, stand-to-sit). This case series suggests that powered knee-ankle prostheses have the potential to reduce overuse of intact joints in emulated real-world conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.