ArticleBlood advances2026
Pregnancy after hematopoietic stem cell transplant: an international multicenter study.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMaintenance of fertility is important to patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) because many are of childbearing age and treatment is frequently sterilizing. Pretransplant fertility preservation counselling is currently limited by a paucity of data. Pregnancy after transplant is an infrequent event and although small studies provide anecdotal information, interpretation of larger data sets can be confounded by lack of detail. In this multicenter study, patients who received a transplant between January 1995 and December 2015 who subsequently became pregnant/partners became pregnant, were identified by centers registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The association of pregnancy with underlying condition, transplant type, and conditioning protocols was evaluated using robust data sets from the EBMT registry. The role of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in pregnancy were also investigated and pregnancy outcomes described. From a data set of 54 323 patients who underwent HCT, there were 621 pregnancies among 419 patients/partners, and 581 live births. There was substantial variation in likelihood of pregnancy after different conditioning protocols with highest rates in women observed after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). ART were used by 33% of females and 56% of partners of male patients, with highest use after allografts using total body irradiation and lowest after RIC. Among females, pregnancy was more frequently associated with donor eggs than the use of their own stored eggs, embryos, or tissue. Widespread use of ART distorts the association between pregnancies after transplant and preservation of gonadal function, however our data highlight multiple factors relevant to contemporary pretransplant counselling and fertility preservation services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.